Office of Conservation

Office of Conservation >> Environmental Division >> Legacy Remediation Plan

H. C. Drew Estate v. ConocoPhillips Co.Neumin Production Company, et al.  
DENR OC Legacy Project No. 014-020-001

Hearing Documents:

• Public Hearing Transcript - March 31, 2022
• Public Hearing Transcript - April 4, 2022
• Neumin - LDENR Amended Exhibit List
• Neumin - LDENR Exhibit List
• Neumin - LDENR Exhibit A List
• Neumin - Hearing Witness List

Court Documents:

• Petition For Damage
• First Supplemental and Amended Petition for Damage
• Neumin's Limited Admission
• Neumin's Motion for Referral to the LDENR and Signed Order
• Signed Order, Motion for Extension of time

LDENR Most Feasible Plan (MFP) and Written Reasons:

• LDENR MFP and Written Reasons

Neumin's's Most Feasible Plan (MFP):

• Neumin's Limited Admission Plan

 Appendices

• Appendix A, ERM Boring Logs
• Appendix B, Acadian Field Reocrds
• Appendix C, Southland Boring Logs and Photos
• Appendix D, LDENR Water Well Records
• Appendix E, Slug Test Reports
• Appendix F, Effective Root Zone Study
• Appendix G, Lab Reports
• Appendix H, Field Notes
• Appendix I, Photos and Photo Logs
• Appendix J, LDENR Well Reg Documents
• Appendix K, Summary of Work Performed and Materials Relied Upon
• Appendix L, Survey Data
• Appendix M, Supporting RECAP Information
• Appendix N, Hypothetical Plan
• Appendix O, Contractor Cost Estimates

 Figures

• Figure 1, ERM Boring Logs
• Figure 2, USGS Topographic Map & Public Land Survey
• Figure 3, Lidar Elevation Model
• Figure 4, Surface Water Features
• Figure 5, ERM Boring Logs
• Figure 6, FEMA Flood Zones
• Figure 7, USFWS Wetlands Map
• Figure 8, USDA Surface Soil Types
• Figure 9, Surface Geology
• Figure 10, Cross Section Locations
• Figure 11, Cross Section A to A1
• Figure 12, Cross Section B to B1
• Figure 13, Thickness of Chicot Confining Unit
• Figure 14, Regional Cross Section
• Figure 15, Louisiana Aquifer Recharge Potential

 Tables

• Table 1, Slug Test Results
• Table 2, Survey Data and Groundwater Elevations
• Table 3, Soil Analytical Data
• Table 4, Groundwater Analytical Data
• Table 5, Groundwater Field Parameters
• Table 6, Soil Screening Evaluation
• Table 7, MO-1 Soil Evaluation, Protection of Groundwater
• Table 8, Groundwater Screening Evaluation
• Table 9, MO-1 Groundwater Evaluation
• Table 10, Proposed Soil Remediation Plan Cost Estimate
• Table 11, Contingent Removal of Gravel Pad Road and Fence Cost Estimate
• Table 12, Proposed Monitoring Well P-A Cost Estimate
• Table 13, References

Neumin's's Most Feasible Plan (MFP), Supplement:

• Table 1, Supplement to Limited Admission Plan

 Attachments

 Attachment-1, Figures

• Figures 31-A, Soil Sample Locations
• Figures 32-A, Spoil Sample Locations - Zoom
• Figures 33-A, Groundwater Sample Locations
• Figures 34-A, Groundwater Sample Locations - Zoom
• Figures 36-A, Soil Statewide Order 29-B Salt Exceedances
• Figures 37-A, Salt Parameter Results Stepout Locations
• Figures 38-A, Salt Parameter Results Production Area
• Figures 39-A, Salt Parameter Results Wethead Area
• Figures 40-A, Salt Parameter Results Tank Battery Area
• Figures 41-A, Chlorine in Groundwater
• Figures 42-A, Chloride in Groundwater

 Attachment-2, Tables

• Table 3-A, Soil Analytical Data
• Table 4-A, Groundwater Analytical Data
• Table 5-A, Groundwater Field Parameters
• Table 10-A, Amended Soil Remediation Plan Cost Estimate
• Attachment 3, 2015-2016 Data
• Attachment 4, Boring Logs
• Attachment 5, Field Notes
• Attachment 6, Photos and Photo Logs
• Attachment 7, Lab Reports

PLaintiff's Response

• Plaintiff's Response Letter to Snellgrove
• Plaintiff's Response Letter to LDNR
• Affidavit of Beau Barbe
• Limited Admission Comments